How to save your favorite Big Cypress lodge from the bulldozers

How to Save Your Favorite Big Cypresses Lodge from the Construction of the Dakota Access Pipeline article If you’ve ever visited the Big Cypers, you’ve probably seen signs warning of the potential impact of the pipeline’s construction on your area.

It’s not an exaggeration to say that if the pipeline gets built, the big trees could be gone in a hurry.

The last time the pipeline was built, in 2016, it did not cause any problems, but that was a decade ago, and the last time there was a major event like that, it wasn’t just the trees that were destroyed.

The construction of the $3.8 billion Dakota Access pipeline began in January, and it will bring more than 1,000 miles of oil and natural gas to the U.S. The pipeline, which is slated to run from North Dakota to Illinois, has been an integral part of the development of the Dakotas oil and gas industry for years, but it has caused some concern among environmental groups, and some local landowners, who say that the pipeline is too close to their property lines.

The Big Cyprees have been the scene of some of the most serious environmental damage, with hundreds of trees cut down, more than 500 cars and trucks damaged, and at least seven deaths.

The impact of this pipeline is not just immediate, but long-term.

The Dakota Access was originally designed to run through the Big Tree National Monument in South Dakota, but the company that built the pipeline, Energy Transfer Partners, has decided to turn the pipeline into a natural gas pipeline that will eventually run through many of the country’s largest natural gas-producing states.

The pipeline is also expected to run under a portion of the Missouri River, which has been a major issue for environmental groups.

The Missouri River is one of the largest waterways in the U, and its waters are used by thousands of farmers and ranchers across the country, and are critical to the health of the water and the climate.

While the Missouri has been the main focus of the protests over the pipeline and the deaths of more than a dozen people, it is also the source of much of the oil that flows through the Missouri.

That oil, in turn, is an important source of fuel for many energy-producing industries.

The Missouri River has been one of those regions where the Dakota Pipeline has been used to deliver energy to the region, and there have been many lawsuits filed against Energy Transfer, including one that has been rejected by a federal judge.

The Standing Rock Sioux Tribe filed a lawsuit against the pipeline in 2016 alleging that it would contaminate drinking water.

The lawsuit also alleged that the Dakota pipeline would contaminately the water of the reservation, which was a potential threat to the drinking water supply of the Sioux Nation, which encompasses many of North Dakota’s Native American tribes.

The lawsuit, which will likely go to the Supreme Court, is likely to have some impact on the Dakota, and President Donald Trump signed a memorandum in September that required Energy Transfer to cease construction of any new pipelines that would transport oil or natural gas.

However, the memorandum also said that if Energy Transfer did not comply with its court order, the company would have to immediately halt the construction of a new pipeline that would carry oil or gas to a processing facility on the Missouri, and that the company could also have to stop transporting crude oil and gasoline through the pipeline.

The President has called the pipeline a “game changer” and the pipeline has been described by the U and other environmental groups as the “biggest environmental disaster in American history.”

President Donald Trump and his supporters say that there are “no good options” to deal with the pipeline; it’s the biggest environmental disaster ever, and a violation of the Constitution.

Environmental groups say that pipelines are an important part of protecting the environment, but this pipeline could have a profound impact on their ability to do so.

They also say that they are worried that the proposed pipeline will have an impact on water quality in the region.